Skip to main content

Trade And Tariff Facts

Trade And Tariff Facts

Tariffs are taxes on the end user. Trade is between individuals or companies. Trade is voluntary and will not happen if both sides are not happy with the outcome, whether one side or the other has tariffs or not.

How trade and tariffs work

Sure, suppliers pay them at the port, but it would be foolish to think that the seller is going to absorb that cost. Such costs are regained by increasing prices to the consumer.
  1. A country decides to place tariffs on products from another country.
  2. Products from manufacturers from that country are charged a tax, that is, a tariff.
  3. The manufacturer raises prices to cover the cost of the tariff, thus passing it onto the receiving countries' buyers.
  4. Thus, the tariff is a tax on the people of the country who levies it.

What if the other country has tariffs on your country's products?

Much is made of trade deficits and other countries "beating" us on tariffs when they place them on our products.
  1. Realize that the providers in your country will increase the end user price of the other country to cover those tariffs.
  2. Remember that trades are voluntary. No deal will be made if it does not benefit both parties.
  3. Attempting to balance the ledger by adding tariffs on the other country does not harm the other country or provider. It is only bad for the end user in your own country. You would tax your own people.
  4. It is never a good idea to use the government to solve issues in private enterprise. It only causes bigger government.

Why not just make all products in country?

That always sounds good, but it has been tried and has always failed.
  1. This is known as industrial policy and the first reason for rejecting it is that it involves government controlling industry.
  2. The method for doing this involves heavy tariffs known as punitive tariffs, on goods that our government seeks to have made in our own country.
  3. Again, it should be noted that the tariff is a tax on the citizen of the country which levels it.
  4. This removes choice from the consumers in the country.
Labels:

Popular posts from this blog

Problems for Federalism if States Can't Determine Eligibility

If the court rules that individual states can not determine eligibility the door would be open to all third parties for ballot access challenges. The court would have to set up or help to establish federal rules to determine eligibility requirements or face a flood of challenges for all 50 states. That seems to be a nail in the coffin of Federalism. A Trump victory in SCOTUS would set up a 50 state rush of indie candidates who would take eligibility questions to the high court. To avoid that they would have to legislate from the bench or convince Congress to legislate an end to Federalism!
Read more

It's All Biden's Fault!

  There was a period of reverse immigration! That is, more people headed south than north, between 2008 and 2016. The Republicans began running on border security in spite of this fact. What do you think happened? The “Quick, let's get in before the opportunity closes!” idea kicked in! We saw a resurgence of immigration not seen in decades! It goes like this: Before Trump: reverse immigration.  Trump lies and threats: massive migration.  Trump regulations: Four years of border backup.  I t's Biden's fault  Today: Biden resets after ending Trump regulation: System working legally and properly with backup gone and new people processed by sending those with no credible claim home and the 1 to 2 percent of credible claims through!  Republicans: But, but, but, where's Hunter? Inflation We all agree that too much money chasing too few goods caused inflation, so what is the solution? Raising interest is not it! Producing more goods is! Why do we have a shortage o...
Read more

Preliminary findings after reading the Durham report

  After reading the report: 1. Did not exonerate Trump. 1. Did not exonerate Trump. 2. Made no suggestion for criminal charges beyond the ones made in an earlier iteration and noted below. 3. Durham found no reason for opening a full investigation into Trump/Russian collaboration at that time. 4. Suggested that the FBI should have opened a preliminary investigation. The implication being that a preliminary investigation would have led to a full investigation. 5. Durham said that it was possible that the FBI needed to put some reforms in place. In addition, the investigation as a whole did see an earlier iteration that made 3 criminal charges: One plead guilty, the 2 others were tried and acquitted. I am awaiting the Durham appearance before congress to do a full report. I have an inescapable sense that there is something else going on here. Similarities between this report and the Müller report like something is being left out of the story by both. Somewhere in my reading, I ran ac...
Read more